Technical documentation is often produced iteratively by a technical writer gathering information from an expert, formatting it and presenting a draft back to the expert for review. This is often a lengthy process requiring many cycles, which does not always produce good documentation.
The main limitations of this process are the writer's understanding of the subject and the expert's availability and willingness to participate in the process.
Our solution to these limitations is to learn about the product from all possible sources before gathering information from an expert. Because of our technical background and extensive knowledge in many fields, this learning period is often short even if we do not have specific knowledge of the product.
Even if it does take a little longer, this process invariably results in better documents, since we understand and are able to explain what we are writing about. After the initial learning period we can often work alone, with only the occasional request for an explanation from an expert, which frees them to continue their normal tasks without interruption.
The final result is high quality documentation which has used resources effectively, has a lower overall cost, and greater long term utility.
These documentation methodology differences are summarised below.
| Traditional Method | Our Method |
| Reliance on few sources of information, frequently a person with other tasks. | Use multiple sources of information, freeing human resources for higher priority work. |
| Many writing and review cycles. | Advanced drafts presented. Fewer cycles. |
| Extensive explanations required. | Less time spent explaining. |
| Less efficient use of expert and writer's time. | More efficient use of time. |